Re: [DMCForum] Re: Cop stories
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DMCForum] Re: Cop stories



On 12/17/05, Dick Ryan <deloreanbiker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Forgive me, but isn't that about the dumbest thing written here in a
> long time; ie., getting cited for a violation of community supported
> rules is okay, but having those rules enforced is not?????

What? I said nothing of the sort. Gary mentioned that it was "funny"
how other professions are not debated to the extent police officers
are. I provided the answer: Police are heavily debated because they
have such power over our lives. I'll try to rephrase my statement.
Perhaps if you understand what I meant, you won't find it so "dumb":

"The problem is that failure to pay a police fine can result in arrest
and jail time, whereas a 'fine' issued by any other entity is a civil
matter and, at most, they can send it to a collection agency or sue
you in small claims court. This is why people get so upset about
police issued fines - the fine itself isn't the issue. The issue is
the power that's used to back it up."

Nowhere did I say enforcing speeding tickets is not OK, and quite
frankly I've no idea how you jumped to that conclusion. I simply
provided an explanation for why police were debated more often than
other professions. The answer lies in the power they have over us.

> Now you can argue that the rules are not "community supported", but if
> the community didn't support them, they would be overthrown.  Yes, I
> know this is an overly simplified generalization, but, please, whether
> you like them or not, traffic rules/ordinances are put in place by and
> for the good of the general population.

Please note that I am not arguing for the elimination of these rules.
In fact, I specifically said, "I'm not saying we should eliminate
speeding tickets."

Why can't issues be compared and contrasted around here without people
jumping to conclusions? My entire point addressed a single issue: Why
police are debated more often than other professions. I said nothing
about whether traffic laws were appropriate. Why have you jumped to
the conclusion that I have a problem with traffic laws?

> The "problem is that failure to pay a speeding ticket can result in
> arrest and jail time" is NOT the problem.  The "power that's used to
> back it up" is power that WE have given to those who represent us.
> Though the power may occasionally be misused, it is an absolutely
> necessary aspect to societal safety in a culture such as ours.

Gah! More commentary supporting traffic laws! I agree with you, for
crying out loud. But that's NOT what I was discussing. I really have
no idea how I could have been more clear in my response.

By the way:

> The "problem is that failure to pay a speeding ticket can result in
> arrest and jail time" is NOT the problem.

Yes, it is! In the context of the "problem" being "why are police
debated so heavily", that's exactly why!

--
- Ryan
http://www.memfrag.com - Store your bookmarks. On every computer.


SPONSORED LINKS
Dmc Dml Dmc fz10
Dmc fz1s Delorean part Dml forte


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS






Home Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN


Copyright 2006 ProjectVixen.com.  All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
DMCForum Mailing List Archive  DMCNews Mailing List Archive  DMC-UK Mailing List Archive