Re: [DMCForum] Re: Going totally electric powered
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DMCForum] Re: Going totally electric powered

So is the "battery" the superconducting waveguide itself, or a pair of 
superconducting waveguides rotating on an axis?

How do you input/output energy to/from this "battery"?

How do you keep the superconductor(s) cool?

I'm not touching the rest of it (black holes, deck of cards, etc).

Jon Heese

Walter Coe wrote:
>> Any ideas yet on what kind of statistics you'll be looking at when
> you're done (speeds, range, etc), or is this still very preliminary?
> I insist that it be able to freely spin wheels and shred tires if I
> stomp the pedal from a full stop.  I have always avoided more
> accidents using the steering & acceleration than with the brake & the
> horn.  Like my Tae Kwon Do teacher used to say, "The best defense is
> to just get out of the way  -- dont be there."  Amen.  As for top
> speed, I would rather that the speed rating of the tires be the
> limiting factor and not the ability of the rest of the car.  As for
> range, the limiting factor is how much hydrogen gas I can fit in a
> tank.
>> I'd
> be very interested in hearing more about these batteries of yours, if
> you are at liberty and/or willing to discuss them.
> I'll try to keep the explanation simple, but I dont expect it will
> make much sense anyway.  This technically isnt a battery, but it works
> like one.  It is more like a hydrogen fuel cell except that it doesnt
> make water when it runs.  Quite the opposite, really.  I cause a
> variety of charge/mass particle stream to run in a wave guide in a
> circle.  This is a superconducting wave guide, so once the particle
> stream is made to circulate within the wave guide then it keeps
> running until I sever the path.  It can store an enormous amount of
> energy in a small space this way.  With the stream circulating, the
> particles accelerate up to the speed of light.  This causes nature to
> adjust accordingly because mass particles do not get along well
> traveling at light speed.  The faster a mass particle moves, the
> heavier it gets and the longer it takes to decay (if it is an unstable
> isotope).  This is stuff that Albert Einstein already figured out.
> The particles also become foreshortened in the direction of travel
> making more room for a follow-the-leader circulation of these mass
> particles.  So the faster I spin up the stream, the more room within
> the stream there is for more particles.  But now there are mass
> particles moving at or near the speed of light, and that causes a
> peculiar time dilation field.  As time slows down within the particle
> stream, the effect bleeds to the outside.  You see, the entire device
> behaves as a macroscopic version of a single iron atomic nuclei.  And
> because it is so big, it "frame drags" everything that is close to it.
>  By frame dragging, I mean that because time is running slower within
> the device, it causes time outside of the device to also run just a
> speck slower.  Not enough to uncalibrate your wrist watch, but you
> could measure it with a very accurate atomic clock.  This also has a
> peculiar effect on Earth gravity and causes squirrely things to happen
> with electricity.  If your source of power is moving forward in time
> at a slower rate than your load, electricity appears to run backwards
> -- relatively speaking.
> Imagine that we have three DeLoreans each carrying a very accurate
> atomic clock, and these cars are all on a race track.  The first car
> is just parked on the shoulder idling.  The second car is traveling at
> 88mph.  The third car is traveling at 90mph.  Now change your
> perspective.  These are not actually cars on a race track.  Instead
> the race track simply represents a time line with the start line being
> time zero and the finish line being several minutes away.  The cars
> are not traveling at a rate of speed.  Instead the cars are all
> traveling forward in time at different rates.  Pretend that we are in
> the fastest moving car and looking at the behavior of the other two
> cars.  If our car is moving forward in time at a rate of 0.9 seconds
> per second and the other car is moving forward in time at a slower
> rate of 0.88 seconds per second then we have a bit of a contradiction.
>  If these were cars literally moving along a race track then from our
> perspective it would merely look like we are moving faster and away
> from the slower moving car.  If you neglect watching the road and the
> parked car and only watch the slower 88mph car then it looks like it
> is receding away from us even tho from its perspective it is happily
> moving along the road like nothing is amiss.  But change your
> perspective back to the time line race track, and you have a seeming
> contradiction.  If you are moving forward in time at a faster rate
> than the other car, then that slower moving car literally appears to
> be moving backward in time.  But that is impossible.  That would
> require that it disappear into the past -- quite a nasty
> contradiction.  We've all seen what happens when Marty goes back to
> 1955.
> Nature has an interesting way of dealing with this.  Nothing actually
> disappears into the past.  Instead from our perspective the slower car
> experiences Earth gravity in a relatively backwards fashion -- it
> weighs absolutely nothing while it is running -- less than if it were
> made of styrofoam.  And anything near it weighs nothing also up to a
> certain distance.  It squelches Earth gravity in the following way:
> The time dilation field spills out of the device neutralizing 100% of
> Earth gravity within its vicinity.  The stronger that the time
> dilation field is, the bigger the volume of the anti-gravity bubble
> that this device creates.  If I make the field big enough then an
> entire car can weigh nothing as well as the ground under it which can
> get a bit messy and disorientating.
> Once this anti-gravity field is predictable, stable and under control
> then some very nice things can be done with it.  Make two of these
> time dilation fields, put them against each other and spin them on a
> common axis, and you get an attractive source of gravity.  Here it
> gets a bit confusing because there are three types of gravity:  The
> first type to make is just the static field that tends to neutralize
> and frame drag other gravitational currents running thru it (i.e.
> Earth gravity).  Then put two sources of this time
> dilation/anti-gravity together and counter-rotate them about a common
> axis (in the proper directior), and that generates attractive gravity
> in the circulation's center.  So now I have explained two different
> types of gravity:  Neutral and attracting.  Here is some more about
> the attracting variety:  It causes ball lightning or literally a small
> star to appear about the axis of rotation.  Do this in a reaction
> vessel that is filled with compressed hydrogen gas, and the star will
> convert the mass of this hydrogen into usable electric power.  But
> this is not Cold Fusion.  That would be combining hydrogen nuclei to
> form helium -- a bit of a waste if you ask me.  Instead this does the
> exact opposite decaying the hydrogen nuclei into free electromotive
> force which is absorbed and back feeds into the equipment that
> generated the anti-gravity field in the first place.  As long as it is
> fed clean hydrogen then it converts the mass of it into electricity
> with no nuclear waste.  The worst that happens is that the rare
> naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen called deuterium leaves an
> extra neutron behind that doesnt really get along with the reaction
> because it spins opposite in time to the proton.  So it takes about
> 100 seconds for them to go away, and when they finally do the energy
> gets absorbed & used just like the decaying protons.  So nothing is
> wasted, and no pollution is generated.
> There is yet a third type of gravity.  Intuition would suggest that it
> must be a repelling sort of gravity, but that never happens.  Gravity
> never repels.  Instead this third type of gravity ignores mass
> particles and only attracts light.  That is what is going on inside of
> black holes.  They absorb light converting it into cold matter where
> it just sits out there in space until it either falls into a star or
> orbits it.  So then why does the sun bend light?  If the star sort of
> gravity reaction is only the sort that attracts matter and not light,
> then why does the sun bend light around it as per Albert Einstein's
> experiment back in the early 1900's?  The reason is because the sun
> contains black holes which fall into it.  And these are visible as sun
> spots.  But when they fall to earth, depending on the variety, they
> either look like UFO's or cause hurricanes.  The black holes in the
> sun are force-fed light which causes them to make lots of matter while
> the sun unwraps that matter turning it back into light in a give &
> take reaction that never never stops.  Time moves forward inside of
> stars and backwards inside of black holes.  This keeps the entire
> universe in perfect balance.  The universe as a whole is always at
> time zero because for every place in it where time moves forward,
> there is an equal sum of areas where time moves backwards.  We do not
> live in an expanding universe.  The red shift in the distant stars is
> not caused by any doppler effect.  Instead, the light from distant
> stars merely looses energy due to friction from passing black holes.
> Extrapolate this observation to subatomic particles and you solve
> everything.  Neutrons are not neutral at all.  They move forward in
> time converting a charge particle associated with the strong nuclear
> force into a free electron where it blows out like light does from a
> star.  Protons run backwards in time absorbing that once free electron
> and converting it back into a mass particle associated with the strong
> nuclear force.  Balance what the particles are doing, and you can
> predict everything that there is to know about the periodic table of
> elements.  A deck of cards is useful here.  Let the suit of Diamonds
> represent stars or neutrons.  Let Hearts represent animal life.  Let
> Clubs represent plant life.  Let Spades represent black holes or
> protons.  Now I have already explained the relationship between Spades
> & Diamonds which are blackholes & stars respectively.  Plant & animal
> life represent similar to teach us what is really going on in the
> universe.  Animals eat the plants converting a tiny amount of that
> mass into energy.  Then we radiate this energy as body heat -- infra
> red which is just another form of light.  So we are as walking stars.
> Plant life does the opposite.  Plants absorb the light converting the
> energy of each photon into a tiny amount of mass that is released
> again once we eat it and burn it in our bodies.  Sounds like I went
> way off on a tangent.  Anyway, consider that a single hydrogen nuclei
> is just 4 of these particles circulating in a vortex.  Helium has 20
> of them - one hydrogen in the center with another 4 pair at each
> corner.  Then you keep building from there until you map out the whole
> periodic table.
> All forces in the universe are simply three manifestations of the same
> unified force.  Each of these three forces are separately three
> dimensional.  Gravity is NOT one of these forces.  Any true force can
> repel as well as attract.  Gravity attracts but in two different ways.
>  One way attracts energy.  The other attracts matter.  So then what
> are the three forces?  Electricity, magnetism and time.  Now that's
> messed up!  Time itself is yet another three-dimensional force.  How
> could it be anything else?  This explains the mechanism of rational
> consciousness.  All of your memory is as a time line.  Time zero is
> your earliest memory, and the line extends into infinity.  Anywhere
> backwards on the line is your past.  Anywhere forward is your future.
> The present is always stuck in the middle.  You can always imagine way
> into the past or future because in your head you create your own
> personal reality, per se.  Not sure anymore.  You can never leave
> unless you are made to do so, and there is only one way that can
> happen.  Now just being aware of such a time line proves that rational
> thought involves more than one dimension of time, hence I submit this
> as proof that time itself is at least more than one-dimension or you
> are not a rational being.  That is the crux of string theory.  They
> keep trying to invent extra dimensions of space to explain things.
> Last I heard, they are up to 11 dimensions with one dimension of time.
>  No.  Wrong.  Electricity has 3 dimensions.  Magnetism has 3
> dimensions.  And time itself also has 3 dimensions.  Rational thought
> is timeless, and I am outtatime.
> All of this is a bit much and confusing and no body -- I mean nobody
> understands what I am trying to say.  And this isnt necessarily real.
> What is real?  Real is just a bunch of thoughts in your head.  I
> figured this out because I read a certain book and asked some really
> strange questions.  Found answers too.  Read the book of Revelation at
> Chapter 2 versus 26 thru 28.  I am in way over my head.  I just want
> an innocent way out of this mess.  It is just a hypothesis.  I dont
> dare call it a theory or a law.  I cant prove anything at this time.
> But I do expect to get my car to run fast & cheap.  Or at least I'll
> die trying.  Death is an acceptable outcome.  Life is all about pain &
> suffering.  I only want to escape this messed up reality or at least
> return to whatever it was before I ever experienced rational thought
> -- I just want the fire in my head to go away.  I am sick of it.
>> Oh, and... Welcome back. :)
> I dont expect to be able to stay for much longer.
>> We just
> need the working capital.
> Me too.  I'm basically out of money, but I have a rental house I may
> sell.  It is worth about $200K and I almost own it free & clear.  The
> problem is that if I sell it then the IRS will want me to file.  I
> haven't filed anything in the last several years.  Its too confusing
> even with a CPA in charge.  The last time I went in the hospital, my
> mom raided my house, went in my office and confiscated my book keeping
> thinking she could do it better than me.  I had to put my foot down
> and promise to leave her forever if she ever tries anything like that
> again.  I lost a lot of bills that way and had to pay extra for being
> late again as usual.  I might need to go back to the hospital soon,
> but they treat me really terrible there.  They get me agitated only so
> that they can bind my hands & feet and inject me with things that only
> make me sicker.  If they do that again I will only try my best to shut
> down and disappear however that may be possible.  Any alternate
> existence is better than this nightmare I live in.  I will not allow
> them to do that to me again whatever good they think they can do me.
> Basically what I need at this point is an electric motor & associated
> circuitry that can fit in a former automatic tranny DeLorean.  I could
> bolt up to the old tranny, but I would rather eliminate the tranny
> altogether.  I would like it to have the fossil fuel equivalent of
> about 300 horse power.  A bank of batteries as for a usual electric
> car would be very useful to regulate the output of this morning star
> reactor.  I need to come up with a way to convert a very high voltage
> output into something that is low voltage without getting into issues
> of dielectric breakdown & such.  It is way better to make a weak
> reaction & spin it up fast rather than a strong reaction spinning
> slowly.  The stronger the anti-gravity field, the more problems the
> car has while moving due to friction with Earth gravity.  Keep the
> field weak, the car weighs normal and then the effects are subtle and
> remain within the reaction vessel.  This sounds too much like Carl
> Tilley.  Yet another mysterious box that seems to generate free
> energy.  Just humor me, okay?  If you dont agree with what I say then
> just consider it a work of science fiction.  With my condition, it
> helps to fantisize a bit, no?  Humor, people!  Nobody can prove any of
> this anyway.  Please dont let them drug or tie me in the hospital
> anymore.  I absolutely will not cooperate that way.  The last doctor I
> saw tried to talk me into forgetting the conspiracy theories.
> Whatever...
>> Did you ever see the documentary "the great global warming swindle" ? It
> did an impressive job of debunking Al Gore's arguments.
> Never heard of it.  But then I dont get out much.  I just know that
> the environment is changing too rapidly whatever the cause.  I see a
> way to eliminate fossil fuel burning in a matter of a few years.  Then
> we wont have to find out who is right or wrong -- only what we have
> left if we make electricity absolutely free for everyone who is
> willing to behave & get along.  Power over nations.  Maybe I could get
> used to being a world dictator, but really, I just want a way out of
> this mess.
> If anyone wants to really help, get me in touch with Brian Green of
> Columbia University and my old physics professor from Hillsborough
> Community College, Mark Crane.  I am absolutely through trying to
> reach anyone for any reason except for some brain fart e-mails on this
> forum.  The more I try, the more I am accused of doing wrong.  So I
> will just try to keep quiet and hopefully the world will stop crashing
> down around me.  If either of those two guys want to talk (in person)
> about what I have said here then fine.  If they are not interested
> then that is fine too.   Sorry to name drop.  Otherwise I am sealed
> and not discussing anything more with anyone -- especially any
> government agencies.
> Walt
> Yahoo! Groups Links

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Home Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN

Copyright 2006  All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
DMCForum Mailing List Archive  DMCNews Mailing List Archive  DMC-UK Mailing List Archive