Re: [DMCForum] Re: Controversy
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DMCForum] Re: Controversy



I'd invite all of you slamming Marc to look at yourself.  Exactly what
is the point of messages like this one but to "generate ill will" toward
Marc?  I'm not trying to slam anyone, just want you all to realize how
mean-spirited message like this appear.  I find it troubling how often
people will express their opinions couched as though they are facts.

As far as opinions go, I disgree with Mike and Gary about Marc's
intentions.  I read just about every message that comes through here,
and I don't recall any message from Marc that I interpreted as outright
trolling or ill-intended.  Marc makes a lot of good points that I often
agree with, but I think sometimes he carries on arguments past their
useful period and often uses less-than-tactful language, which turns a
lot of people off to his point.

Am I more thick-skinned than you who complain about him?  Do I have a
longer attention span?  Is it just because I don't outright disagree
with the majority of his arguments that allows me to tolerate his
repetitive rants?  I don't know, but I am curious.  Either way, I
suppose I just wanted to make it clear that not everyone is on the
"Marc's a jerk" bandwagon.  :)

Regards,
Jon Heese

mike clemens wrote:
> Having watched Marc for several years now, I have
> found that about 1 out of 10 of his posts are worth
> reading.  He has a reputation for "trolling" and most
> of the Forum members just ignore his attempts to
> generate ill will amoung the membership.
>
> Mike
>
>
> --- dmcgman <DmcGman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>>I agree Mike.  And I have gotten about five private
>>emails pretty
>>much stating the same thing.  Have to take Marc's
>>advice and use
>>that "delete key" more often for his posts :-)
>>
>>Of course in my opinion, if the comments weren't
>>usually made to
>>generate controversy, why would else would there be
>>a suggestion to
>>have a Dunking Booth at a National Delorean Event
>>for Marc?  Wish I
>>thought of it.  Sounds like a goldmine to me. :-)
>>
>>
>>--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mike clemens
>><rmclemns@xxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>Sure Marc, It ain't about biggest, it's about
>>>debating, and in this case, you ain't debating,
>>
>>you're
>>
>>>instigating.  Maybe you need to look up the
>>
>>defination
>>
>>>of AW (a military term).  You might recognize
>>>yourself...... 
>>>
>>>Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--- Marc Levy <malevy_nj@xxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>It is not about biggest anything.  Some people
>>
>>enjoy
>>
>>>>debating.  I guess you don't.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--- dmcgman <DmcGman@xxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Marc you can discuss the topic all you want.
>>
>>I
>>
>>>>far
>>>>
>>>>>better things to
>>>>>do than engage in it or point all the
>>
>>inaccuracies
>>
>>>>>you state
>>>>>regarding law enforcement.  You can maintain
>>
>>the
>>
>>>>>biggest "soapbox" as
>>>>>you enjoy. 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>
>>>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>>>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
>>>>protection around
>>>>http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>__________________________________________________
>>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
>>
>>protection around
>>
>>>http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>

> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

>
>
>


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS






Home Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN 


Copyright ProjectVixen.com. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
DMCForum Mailing List Archive  DMCNews Mailing List Archive  DMC-UK Mailing List Archive

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated