Re: [DMCForum] Re: de-emissioning (Marc)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DMCForum] Re: de-emissioning (Marc)



Fell of the chair laughing at that comment.

Thank you.

Mark V


On Aug 9, 2005, at 11:05 PM, Marc Levy wrote:

> Fuel Economy *IS* emissions.
>
> Best I can tell, you removed those components because
> your too lazy to replace them??  Or like the way the
> engine looks without them?
>
> I sometimes try hard to see things from your point of
> view, but I can't get my head that far up my ass.
>
>
> --- content22207 <brobertson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I thought I made that clear in my post:
>>
>> EGR: I oppose the concept of making an engine
>> breathe its own exhaust.
>> EGR is a fuel economy measure anyway, not emissions.
>> This particular
>> system was MUCH larger than the old fashioned
>> diaphragms too, which
>> put it all in my way.
>>
>> Smog pump: Again, the plumbing was in the way
>> (couldn't remove
>> passenger side spark plugs with it in place). Would
>> have been useless
>> once I put the new exhaust system on anyway.
>>
>> Thermactor bank: Overlayed the coil, which made
>> installing its wire
>> difficult. Also had to be removed to remove the
>> driver side valve
>> cover. And without a smog pump the thermactors have
>> nothing to do.
>> Jetisoning them also allowed me to jetison those
>> stupid hard plastic
>> vacuum lines.
>>
>> The engine compartment looks much less cluttered
>> now. I really don't
>> like to see a thousand wires & hoses when I pop a
>> hood. I definitely
>> don't like to work around them. Simplicity used to
>> be a virtue...
>>
>> Bill Robertson
>> #5939



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS






Home Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN 


Copyright ProjectVixen.com. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
DMCForum Mailing List Archive  DMCNews Mailing List Archive  DMC-UK Mailing List Archive

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated