[DMCForum] Re: Looking for Captain Hydrogen
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[DMCForum] Re: Looking for Captain Hydrogen




Joe P.,

You are correct in saying that hydrogen is explosive, but keep in
mind, so is gasoline and in every way hydrogen is safer than gasoline.

Consider accident scenarios:

A gasoline powered car is in an accident and there is a fuel leak. 
In modern manufacturing gasoline tanks are made with either blow
molded plastic tanks or with seam welded stamped sheet metal.  Fuel
lines are a combination stainless steel and synthetic line.  The
stainless lines are most likely to bend in an accident so the likely
rupture point will be along the synthetic fuel line or it will be a
fuel tank failure.  If the line is cut, there will be a faster loss
of gasoline. If the tank ruptures, then the loss of liquid gasoline
will be enormous.  Gasoline will leak, pool, and vaporize, but
because it is heavier than the ambient air it will remain localized
to the accident scene until it dissipates by wind or until the
Hazardous Materials crew has quarantined the area.  If any of the
vaporized gasoline comes in contact with a heat source of 536 degrees
F or greater, then there will be an explosion.  If the gasoline pools
in a ditch or off the paved surfaced, then some will permeate the
soil while the rest vaporizes and both are ground and air pollutants.

A hydrogen powered car is in an accident and there is a fuel leak. 
Gaseous hydrogen storage tanks as approved by the Department of
Transportation, such as those manufactured by The CNG Cylinder
Company or by Structural Composites Industries (SCI)
(www.scicomposites.com) are carbon fiber wrapped spun aluminum and
are designed to withstand and pass severe auto impact, 357 gunfire,
high temperature bonfire, and dynamite testing and as far as I have
observed, were only punctured with an armor piercing round fired from
an M16.  Unless the car has been rear ended by a 747, it is unlikely
to rupture.  All of the fuel lines are stainless steel and are burst
tested to 12,000 psi. (Keep in mind that DOT currently restricts
pressurized gas storage to 3,600 psi. in most cases, but will allow
4,500 and 6,000 on occasion.)  In all of the testing scenarios the
only fail point was the pressure relief device on the compressed gas
cylinder.  This is designed to vent the hydrogen directly to the
atmosphere usually at the opposite end of the vehicle from the
engine.  For the sake of argument let's say the pressure relief
device opens and releases hydrogen.  The hydrogen escapes almost
immediately upward at a rate 14x lighter than ambient air.  Unless
there is a arcing heat source of 1,080 degrees F at the periphery of
where the hydrogen meets atmospheric oxygen there will be no ignition
of the hydrogen.  This scenario is true even if the fuel line or
compressed gas cylinder is ruptured.  If there is ignition of the
hydrogen, it will remain only where the periphery of hydrogen and
oxygen meet and will burn almost upward.  Again, ignition would
require 1,080 degrees F at the hydrogen cloud's periphery where it
meet atmospheric oxygen.  In the case of cryogenic hydrogen, the
spill would immediately cryogenically freeze the road and then the
hydrogen would immediately evaporate and dissipate upward at a rate
14x lighter than ambient air.

On my hydrogen powered go-kart the driver sits between to SCI ALT-604
cylinders rated to allow 4,500 psi.  Having these cylinders in a
horizontal position greatly lowers the center of gravity and improves
driver safety by lending themselves to being side impact protection. 
Their shape and construction allows them to with stand enormous
forces.

When you said, "I really doubt compressed hydrogen will catch on as a
wide spread consumer fuel source.  The hydrogen fuel cells however,
those could be somewhat safer than simply powering the engine off
compressed hydrogen, simply because there is significantly less
plumbing that is likely to leak.  If you want to convert you DeLorean
to an alternate fuel source definitely go with the fuel cell.  It's
quieter and safer."  It sounds as if you believe that a Hydrogen Fuel
Cell actually stores hydrogen.  It doesn't.  A Hydrogen Fuel Cell is
another way to convert chemical energy into useable electrical
current for use with an electric motor.  Both Internal Combustion
Engines (ICE) and Fuel Cell Electric (FCE) vehicles store hydrogen in
exactly the same way.  ICE uses hydrogen instead of gasoline and FCE
uses hydrogen instead of batteries.  Hydrogen in its most simple of
terms is a "Universal Energy Carrier".

Please let me know if you have any other questions.

Thank you,
Ben Ferguson (Captain Hydrogen)
Arizona DeLorean Club (www.az-d.org), Car Cruise Director - VIN 10365
American Hydrogen Association (www.clean-air.org), Member of the
Board of Directors
Sonoran Scientific, LLC (Personal Interest and part time Renewable
Hydrogen Energy Systems R&D), Owner
captainhydrogen@xxxxxxx

--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Palatinus, Joe" <jopalatinus@xxxx>
wrote:
> What no one seems to mention about using compressed hydrogen in
vehicles, is that it is very explosive.  (and because it is a gas, it
is much more volatile that liquid fuel sources such as gasoline). 
Although I am sure (compressed) hydrogen powered cars could be
designed to be safe for driving, I would be very concerned about
getting into an accident with a tank of hydrogen.
> Think about it, if two normal cars crash into eachother and one of
their fuel lines is a little broken so there is a small fuel drip,
every one involved would have a much better chance of not exploding
into a ball of flames, than if the car had hydrogen fuel and the
hydrogen gas were be pissing out (in which case there would be a BIG
explosion).  I really doubt compressed hydrogen will catch on as a
wide spread consumer fuel source.  The hydrogen fuel cells however,
those could be somewhat safer than simply powering the engine off
compressed hydrogen, simply because there is significantly less
plumbing that is likely to leak.  If you want to convert you delorean
to an alternate fuel source definately go with the fuel cell.  Its
quieter and safer.
> my 2 cents
> Joe P.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Yahoo! Groups Links



Home Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN 


Copyright ProjectVixen.com. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
DMCForum Mailing List Archive  DMCNews Mailing List Archive  DMC-UK Mailing List Archive

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated