[DML] Re: Upgraded Front Suspension
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[DML] Re: Upgraded Front Suspension

I suspect Ed wanted more triangulation. Imagine standing with your feet together versus standing with your feet apart. 

Those of you running skinny lower control arms (which pinch in and get ever skinnier at the pivot bushing BTW) have no idea what you are missing.

Bill Robertson

--- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marc Levy <malevy_nj@...> wrote:
> I agree with that Martin, but Ed's use of bushings on both ends of that custom rod (looks like a modified rear link), it may still have enough forward/aft movement to accommodate the arc of the ARB.  
> Anyone know why Ed felt this solution was better than his own bolt-on "outriggers"?  (is that the official name?)
> --- On Fri, 10/28/11, Martin Gutkowski <martin@...> wrote:
> > Even that isn't a true wishbone
> > because there's compliance between the original LCA and the
> > reinforcement. That needs to be a solid connection in order
> > for it to be a true wishbone, which is the ultimate goal.
> >


To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:

For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com

To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnewsYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Home Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN

Copyright 2006 ProjectVixen.com.  All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
DMCForum Mailing List Archive  DMCNews Mailing List Archive  DMC-UK Mailing List Archive