[DMCForum] Re: Shenanigans?

["Mike Walsh" <yahoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

... and a news report on CNN last night reported that 98% of all 
votes from dead people (voter fraud) were for Democrats. 

- Mike Walsh

--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Bob Brandys <BobB@xxxx> wrote:
> There are many inconsistencies with this election
> 
> 1. Historically,  according the yesterday's WSJ, if the market 
dropped 
>  >0.5% in October, the incumbent president would lose.  Well, it 
dropped 
> more than 0.5% in October. and BUSH won. This goes against history.
> 
> 2. Newly registered voters historically have always been more 
> democratic.    How many times  did all the pollsters say the new 
young 
> people who voted were mainly democratic.  Well, this sure did not 
appear 
> in the numbers.  
> 
> 3.  Since only 15% more people voted than in 2000  105 million vs 
120 
> million, WHY were there such long lines. These lines were not 
present in 
> 2004.  
> 
> 4. Since more electronic voting was used this year, and electronic 
> voting is almost twice as fast than paper ballots - Why were there 
such 
> long lines?  Was the number of polling places restricted.?  Were 
they 
> moved?  Two polling places in a democratic area in  republican 
> controlled dupage were moved to areas where there was no parking- 
the 
> day before the election.  On was a car dealer? Hey, any one who 
votes 
> the "right" way gets a discount!  and the other was in basement of 
an 
> old building on a dead end street.
> 
> 5. Since most of the new voter registrations were young people -who 
did 
> vote - according to the polls- then Kerry should have ended up with 
more 
> democratic votes. But he got less votes - which is in conflict with 
the 
> voter registration data.
> 
> 6. More black voters turned out than every before and they voted 
for 
> Kerry more than every before.  Than why did Kerry get less votes?
> 
> The only conclusion is the votes don't agree with the registration 
and 
> voting history statistics.  
> 
> Extrapolating the historical statistics Kerry should have won by at 
> least 10,000,000 votes.  
> Since he did not,  and if you believe that voting machines and vote 
> counting were rigged
> 
> (As Stalin said- it does not matter who votes- what matters is who 
> counts the votes)
> 
> Then approximately 15% of the votes were stolen or rigged.  (you 
heard 
> the stories about the machines in florida that would only vote for 
bush 
> both in the primary and in this election)
> What is strange is  NO Machine was ever found to be voting ONLY for 
> KERRY.  You computer dudes know this is not possible!
> 
> Only a detailed analysis of what happened by an unbiased party in 
the 
> future will explain why Kerry lost.  Or we may never know.  
> 
> Or american democracy is only an illusion!
> 
> BOB

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT

---

Yahoo! Groups Links

• To visit your group on the web, go to:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/
   
• To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   
• Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.