The sound is all digital just like a DVD, nice and clear. Now you can
only achieve this by using the RCA and Super-video connections, dont
use the coax cable on a satellite other wise you should stick with
cable because the sound and picture quality suffers.
I plan on upgrading soon to the HD receiver as soon as my TV gets
finished upgrading to HD then i can use the RGB component cables for
superior picture quality. See cable takes all of this quality off
satellite, pumps it through the cable into your house then you have to
reconvert it back to a quality signal again, thats like eating an
Apple, shitting it out then trying to make an Apple out of the shit,
you just cant recreate the exact Apple again because part of it got
digested and distorted between eating it and shitting it out.
Mark V
On Wednesday, July 21, 2004, at 09:42 PM, Farrar Hudkins wrote:
> How's the sound quality? My problem with cable was not image but the
> fact that the audio sounded as if it had been run through a compressor
> and then had a bad attempt at re-expansion done to it.
>
> --Farrar
>
> DMCVIN6683 wrote:
>> I have had Direct TV for almost 10 years now, as long as you have a
>> clean view to the sky and have your dish positioned correctly you will
>> loose the signal during real bad storms only.
>>
>> Satellite is better than cable because cable takes the signal off the
>> satellite, breaks it down and pumps it through a cable into your home,
>> satellite removes the middle man that cable uses because all of our
>> signal comes directly from the satellite not a cable station that got
>> it off a satellite.
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN