Re: Delorean Question

["cruznmd" <racuti1@xxxx>]

Wow. I can only imagine the responses that will come of this! Where 
to begin?

First, if you're looking for performance, don't come here. These cars 
only had 137 hp stock. Upgrades have increased this to nearly 200 hp.
You can't compare a 23 year old car to a 8 or 9 year old car. It's 
like apples and oranges. They don't handle the same. They weren't 
built with the same idea in mind. The DeLorean was meant to be 
an "executive sports car" for rich old foggies to cruise around in. 
It was a status thing.

Why is a DeLorean better? It's a matter of your taste. There are only 
a few left. You'd be part of a special group of discerning people. 
I've made a lot of friends here. I've learned a lot about the car. I 
bought mine because it's part of our national history and pop culture 
and I wanted to save it.

Forget those rice rockets. Come to the dark side and join us!

Rich
#5335- Maryland
--- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dan McNasby <dan_mcnasby@xxxx> wrote:
> 
> I am very interested in buying a Delorean but would like to know 
what are the relative merits of the DeLorean over the Following Cars 
(basically, why buy the delorean over the following) are:
> 
> 1. 1994 Dodge Viper RT/10
> 
> 2. 1995 Acura NSX
> 
> Why is the DeLorean better to own than the above cars? 
> 
> Thanks for the input!
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]