Re: [DML] fuel sending units
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DML] fuel sending units
- From: "Doug Menkhaus" <dmenkhaus@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:08:25 +0000
I just bought a new fuel pump last year in my restoration efforts. Now I discover my sending unit is no good. I don't need (or want) a $400 combo unit..my pump is new. I just want a $99 OEM style sending unit.
My .02..
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Rice <stevedmc@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:39:53
To: <dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [DML] fuel sending units
I sort of retract what I said about the float bouncing around. It
probably will, but what Dave S said about the computer chip stuff in
it makes sense. If Dave says it, then its gospel.
But I'm still happy with my $99 sender. If it ever needs to be
replaced, i'm only replacing the sender.
-Steve Rice
#16510
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Stephen Rice <stevedmc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yep. I believe I saw a picture of Houston's fancy $400 combo unit and
> if I remember correctly it has a lever arm with a float attached for
> the fuel sender. My guess is that a float is going to be bouncing all
> over the place as fuel moves back and forth in the tank. What is
> ironic too is the new fuel pump/sender does away with the baffle and
> it seems like people have been preaching for years that the original
> baffle is far better than a tuna fish can. It seems that Houston's
> new baffle is just going to be another fancy version of a tuna fish
> can. Btw, I'm baffling fuel for my carburetor with a tuna can and it
> works great. The only complaint I have is someone else got to eat the
> tuna.
>
> Their $99 fuel sender was a good value and I am very happy with my
> unit. It works good, there is no silly TankZilla box to stash away,
> and I don't have to worry about disconnecting stuff such as a fuel
> pump or fuel lines if I ever have to replace it. The $99 DMCH fuel
> sender takes less time to replace than it does for me to put gas in
> the car.
>
> If you ask me, discontinuing this product was a foolish decision on
> Houston's part. I find this move slightly amusinge since all it is
> going to do is give Hervey some extra business. I know who I will
> purchase my next fuel sender from if my DMCH unit fails and can't be
> repaired. :)
>
> -Steve Rice
> #16510
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Martin Gutkowski <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Citroen use similar combined units too, in fact when I saw the unit in my Xantia the idea crossed my mind some years ago, but the problem with a lever arm based unit is that it'll be up and down like a yoyo as you drive without some electronic damping
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> Sent from my BlackBerry®
--
Steve Rice
#16510
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:
moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx
For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com
To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnewsYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
dmcnews-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
dmcnews-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN