[DML] Re: "Fastest" DeLoreans (WAS: Don Steger's cams)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DML] Re: "Fastest" DeLoreans (WAS: Don Steger's cams)
- From: "Piszar" <piszar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:22:11 -0000
To add 2 cents to the discussion, auto manufacturers do not measure
their HP at the rear wheels (that is typically a measurement to
track increases in performance from incremental engine improvements
for racing cars). Why should DMCH be any different than other
manufacturers?
There is enough Delorean confusion among the general public as it
is, measuring HP at the wheel would only seem to add to that. Not
to mention the fact that it is a lower number than when measured at
the flywheel and becomes an apples-to-oranges issue when comparing
to other vehicles.
Sandor
# 3002
--- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "gullwingmag" <gullwing-
magazine@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks for clearing that up. I agree with Mark L... we need to
use a
> standard reference so there is no mis-quoting.
>
> Ron
>
> --- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Martin Gutkowski - DMC Ltd
> <martin@> wrote:
> >
> > This is the problem with mis-quoting. I was talking about
> horsepower at
> > the wheels. This is very different from hp at the flywheel which
is
> > where Houston (and all the manfucaturers out there) quote their
> best
> > figure. The dyno session I know about (wasn't there) on a DMCH
> Stage II
> > hit 130 at the wheels. The Alpine I was with at a rolling road
was
> > measured at 43hp drag in the transmission, but it's not an exact
> > science. That hit 260+hp at the wheels from a chargecooled 3
litre
> turbo
> > running 1.2 bar of boost (18psi) so you can understand my
> skepticism
> > that ANY 3 litre naturally asp 12v PRV can hit 210 at the
wheels,
> > especially when running K-Jet.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > gullwingmag wrote:
> >
> > > --- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmcnews%
> 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > Martin Gutkowski - DMC Ltd <martin@>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > (by comparison, Houston's Stage II is roughly 130-140 on a
good
> day).
> > >
> > > Isnt this the engine DMC Houston advertises at 197hp? Did you
> actually
> > > dyno the Stage II and only get 130-140hp?? Who should we
> believe???
> > >
> > > Ron
> > >
> > > #1529 Screamin Yellow D
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:
moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx
For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com
To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:dmcnews-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:dmcnews-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN