[DML] Re: Values
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DML] Re: Values
- From: "Derek" <derek.grozio@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:56:40 -0000
--- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ryan Wright <ryanpwright@xxxx> wrote:
>Claiming a car is low book simply because it's driven often is
>ridiculous. It really depends on the market for that particular car.
>
>-Ryan
I feel the same way, and take a bit different position on the argument.
I purchased a car that was all original and cosmetically in great
condition. I wanted to use this as a daily driver, so I have been
putting money into making it reliable as a everyday car. I did not want
to go out and buy a "$9k book value" car in poor cosmetic condition
simply because it has 100k miles on the clock and can run good. As
after looking into the lack of interior parts, the cost to redo an
interior or exterior panels of a D is much more costly than putting
money towards mechanical parts that are still in abundance.
My option was a $12k car in good running order but needing lots of
cosmetic work, or a $14k car with 3k miles and great cosmetic
condition, but all original. I opted for the better looking car, as I'd
rather spend the time fixing mechanical components that I know are done
once I finish with them.
-Derek #10084
To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:
moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx
For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com
To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN