Re: [DML] Can we ALL come to a correct definition of these DeLorean terms?

["cbl1739" <cbl302@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Can we ALL come to a correct definition of these DeLorean terms?



Simple,anything before vin 649(649 was the supposed first official 
car sold to the general public) IS company owned cars,(NOT to be used 
as a product for consumer use/or sold/for factory or 
authorised/assigned use only,then orignally meant to be destroyed or 
dismantled,or used by QAC for parts ect.
Anything after 
vin 648 is a product(ion) of/for consumer use,consumption/ownership 
ect. Bottom line,there were only two types of cars Company owned 
cars,or Customer owner cars,AND THE REAL TRUE #1 Prototype car was 
NOT even a Delorean...it was a Fiat X19,supposet #1 proto(the one 
owned by DMCF) IS really #2 proto,#2proto is really #3 proto ect.
cbl




--- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, George DeLorean 
<phantomoftheopera_gk@xxxx> wrote:
>
> My words aren't really definitions, but I at least
> thought of a way to shorten the terms. :P  George D.
> 
> 
> 		
> __________________________________ 
> Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! 
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>








To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:
moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx

For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com

To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/