Re: Lee Models

["Dave Swingle" <swingle@xxxx>]

Moderator comments on this - we actually cut this discussion off a 
long time ago because we were asked to by Ken, the guy helping Lee 
out. It is my understanding that there are, in comparison to the 
population of the list (over a thousand) comparatively few people 
that got hosed on this deal (maybe 20 or so). Maybe its time to write 
it off and move on. Or take legal action if you think it's really 
worth it. Complaining to 1000 people who have nothing to do with Lee 
or the model isn't going to accomplish anything. 

I let it start up again this time because it seemed like some new 
info had come to light, that there may be some people involved who
had not hooked up with the impacted group, and it was interesting 
to hear what was "in the box". Most people never opened it. 

At this point I'm ready to cut it off again unless someone has some 
new information. We're not interested in seeing who can say the most 
negative things about Lee, it won't do any good and won't do the list 
any good politically or legally. Lee is not a subscriber to this 
list, so complaining here doesn't really do anything to solve your 
problem. 

If someone knows the URL to the mailing list that Ian mentioned that 
is specifically made up of people burned on this deal I'll let that 
post so that you can figure out as a group (class) what to do. That 
is where any further discussion of legalities should be had.

Dave Swingle

--- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Tom Watkins <dmctom@xxxx> wrote:
> I think that the moderation team is correct in letting this topic 
back. 
> Someone had asked the questions as to why the topic of Lee Sieler 
was 
> frowned upon in the past. It is my belief that it was due to the 
fact 
> that Lee was making reproduction DMC keys and was the only source 
for 
> these items. The fear was that if we as a group, offended Lee he 
would 
> stop making the keys.