Re: Lamda system mandatory?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lamda system mandatory?
- From: "Harold McElraft" <hmcelraft@xxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:47:12 -0000
If the fuel system has no Lambda then it is not K-jetronic. I doubt
if the engine could pass an emissions test in the US.
Harold McElraft - 3354
--- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "content22207" <brobertson@xxxx>
wrote:
> Hate to throw sand in the gears, but my PRV runs excellent with
> absolutely no Lamda system whatsoever. As soon as I get out of this
> sling & wrap will drive the vehicle (fast and smooth) to a fellow
w/
> digital camera to document (if you look closely at pics in #5939's
> photo album you can see what I'll zoom in on -- no frequency
valve, no
> line to lower chambers, capped O2 sensor bung). True, my fuel
> distributor may be different internally (Martin G, could you get
> Darren to look into that?). But even if I have no lower chambers,
> wouldn't simply removing fuel pressure from lower chambers in a DMC
> unit yield the same result? My fuel distributor has a Bosch ID tag
BTW
> (will quote model number when I get home). Is aluminum.
>
> Bill Robertson
> #5939
>
> <snip>
>
> A properly
> set-up and operating PRV won't run right without the lambda
system, it
> adds a little fuel to make the air-fuel ratio correct. With a dead
O2
> sensor the Lambda will revert (fallback) to a fixed value. The big
> symptom would be a loss of power and terrible acceleration. It is
even
> worse if the Lambda system is dead completely.
> David Teitelbaum
> vin 10757
>
> <snip>
>
> You cannot remove the
> lambda and successfully get an accurate air-fuel ratio across the
> RPM band without going to another injection setup. Bosch K-Jetronic
> has to have the lambda to work.
> Harold McElraft - 3354
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN