Re: [DML] Accumalator
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DML] Accumalator
- From: Martin Gutkowski <webmaster@xxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 14:18:40 +0000
Nobody's pointed out the more obvious reason for higher octane fuel: It has more chemical
energy. With the timing set to take advantage of this, you get more power, otherwise
you'll be exhausting burning gases.
I think there are obvious differences in the way the octane rating is expressed between
here and the US
Cheers
Martin
#1458
B Benson wrote:
> If an engine is designed to use 86 octane that's what you should use. Higher
> octane fuels are blended to combust at a slower pace while lower octane
> fuels burn much faster. This is opposite of what many may think. If you use
> the higher octane fuel the slower combustion can, over a long period of
> time, produce carbon deposits in the combustion chamber which raise the
> compression ratio. Higher compression ratios require higher octane, slower
> burning fuels. Therefore it's possible that your car can develop a
> dependency for high octane at some point. The slow burn of high octanes is
> necessary for turbo cars because the slower burn helps retard detonation
> which is when combustion takes place too early and catches the piston still
> trying to finish the compression cycle while the combustion is trying to
> drive it back down. The higher intake temperatures that come with turbo
> charging create that situation. The bottom line is you're wasting money
> using higher octane fuel if your engine wasn't designed for it.
>
> Bruce Benson
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN