[DML] Re: TA Bolt questions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DML] Re: TA Bolt questions
- From: DMCVegas@xxxx
- Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 16:39:17 -0000
--- In dmcnews@xxxx, dherv10@xxxx wrote:
<SNIP>
>Apparently
> Colin Chapman thought the 10.9 would work fine or he
wouldn't have approved
> it. Maybe he did over look it. But others long ago up graded to
the 12.9...
<SNIP>
Who knows if Chapman, Kimberly, or anyone else @ Lotus even
bothered to research this. Don't forget that the only time anyone
really put any kind of real effort into engineering the DeLorean
was when either JZD, or someone from DMC showed up. Other
than that, they shoved the prototypes into the back, and were
working on Esprits. Not even Chapman wanted to work on the
DeLorean project. The Juhan's are the one's who made him
take the contract.
I would have to go with the theory here that Lotus simply
transplanted the specs for the pivot bolts on the trailing arms to
the DMC-12 from the Esprit.
Granted the pivot bolts on the trailing arms are cause for
concern if you have not inspected them. Maintenace is the key to
detection of future problems. So worrying about a sudden failure
out of the blue probably isn't a concern. But they are a critical
component for the rear suspension. And for Chapman & Lotus
to be experts in suspension design and engineering, they
obviously failed to lived up to their reputation in this case. I'm not
knocking Lotus' ability, just their dedication to contracted
projects. I'm sure that if you own a Esprit, you probably have no
worries. But if you own a car made by another mfg who
contracted work to Lotus, be wary of what they designed.
-Robert
vin 6585 "X"
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN