Re: [DML] Re: airbox performance

["at88mph" <at88mph@xxxx>]

Actually,

I suggest some quarter mile runs. The reason why is b/c the difference is
going to be the air flow, which would be hard to define on a dyno. Now, if
you take the car and put the stock airbox back on and do a quarter mile run,
or even a eight mile run, then do the same with the 'new airbox' you would
get an accurate measurement of what was gained. (and you could calculate
and correct for the varing 60 foot times as well to be completely accurate)


Just a thought,


Duke

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Griese" <mike.griese@xxxx>
To: <dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 4:21 PM
Subject: [DML] Re: airbox performance


. Invest a little more in your invention and
> take your car to a rolling road dyno and run your car with
> the original airbox and your new airbox. .
>
> Mike