[DML] Re: DMC ABUSE
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DML] Re: DMC ABUSE
- From: Jus4sho@xxxx
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 08:54:28 EDT
In a message dated 8/19/99 7:56:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
RappaRivaRat@xxxx writes:
<< Then how would you explain that those "low mileage" D's ALWAYS
command a higher price? >>
How about, heavy-pocketed buyers incorrectly applying a late model vehicle
purchasing standard to an older collector vehicle? Mileage is a fine way to
evaluate a '96 Volvo, but condition, aesthetic AND mechanical is what
determines how good a collector vehicle really is. If I'm looking for
asomething I plan to actually drive, then I want one that has been
"broken-in", driven, AND maintained. It's proven itself.
(I'll relate a story from a Viet Nam veteran: Periodically, the army would
issue/offer new m-16 rifles to the soldiers. Some would trade in their old
ones for new ones, but the soldiers who knew their rifles and maintained them
well, would always keep their old ones. The reason? The new rifles were
prone to jamb at the worst moments. The older, broken-in and maintained
ones, operated reliably.)
A higher price doesn't really mean that something is better or that you're
getting more, but unfortunately many people have this perception. Finally,
have you ever wondered why shops that do brake jobs typically charge more for
disc brakes than drum? If you've done brakes yourself, you know what I'm
talking about. I dare you to find any mechanic that would rather do drum
brakes than disc!
my $0.02
Steve
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN