RE: [DMCForum] Re: the EV1... vs Diesel
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [DMCForum] Re: the EV1... vs Diesel



>Yeah. It just doesn't "feel" like it's worth much. But I can't show
>you this quantitatively, it's just a feeling.


Well, by all means let's trust a feeling instead of actual research and hard
numbers.  :-)


>Ha! Don't buy the more efficient vehicles then! Problem solved.


That was my exact response to BOB.  If I wanted a higher mileage vehicle I
would go buy one.  Don't MAKE me go buy one.


>If everyone fully understood the implications of the looming energy
>problems, I'm confident that you'd be in the minority with that opinion.


I am not convinced we have a "looming energy problem".  There was a movie
made recently where a politician, not a scientist in any stretch of the
imagination, tried to convince people of this.  I prefer real, hard facts
and data that can be substantiated.  For what it's worth, I would not
blindly believe any "movie" from someone saying the exact opposite either.


>For the most part, it isn't. The only difference is that we have the
>chance to either do it or not do it right now. Everywhere else is
>already done.


How can anyone possibly predict how much time we have left?  They can't.
They may have a rough idea, but have you ever heard a report about something
where they say, "experts are shocked by this outcome as it was not what they
predicted."


>Add to that the concerns of environmental types about the effects of
>drilling in ANWR, and it seems like a dubious prospect in my mind. A
>decent "last ditch" effort, but not something particularly interesting
>to me right now.


They can go into ANWR and drill with very little environmental impact.  A
recent report I read stated the US is actually one of the lower polluters on
the planet.  Don't even get me started on China.


>Sorry to say it, but I think this attitude is pure BS. First of all,
>why do we always feel it necessary to make everything into a contest
>for jobs, economy, etc. among the nations of the world? From the dawn
>of civilization we've been warring with neighboring clans, and
>frankly, it's stupid. I know it sounds very hippyish and trite, but
>if there's any problem that should bring the nations of the world
>together in finding a solution, it's this.


It's not BS.  Contest and competition are what drives innovation.  All sorts
of things have been invented that didn't have a use only to later find a use
for them.  You want to change what nature has created for millions of years?
On a very simple level, people fighting is what makes us more strong -
survival of the fittest.


>Secondly, again, this is putting the cart before the horse. Just
>because you're sure that alternate energy sources will turn into
>another Big Oil, we should be less interested in pursuing them?


Nope.


>Most alternate energy sources don't have these same inherent dirty
>qualities.


There is still waste from manufacturing that will exist.  Maybe one day it
won't be that way.


>Plus ethanol is renewable.



Not if you are using it faster than it can be renewed.  :-)


>Sure, but you wouldn't argue that a junkie shouldn't bother with rehab
>because of the effects of withdrawal, would you? Solar, wind, water
>and nuclear energy are NOT dubious in terms of their promise and
>cleanliness. There is no gamble involved here.


This is not a valid comparison.  Being a junkie does not in anyway produce
anything positive, other than lining the pockets of the dealers.


>I'm not talking about developing electric cars and ignoring coal-fired
>power plants. I'm talking about a paradigm shift to cleaner,
>renewable energy sources. There is no great chasm to jump into; the
>technology is very solidly proven, and estimates are very reliable. I
>just don't think there is as much doubt as you make it sound like.


Some people do, even expert scientists.


>It is rather difficult for me sometimes to put together answers to
>some of your points because I've honestly never heard anyone try to
>argue that fossil fuels are not dirtier than alternate energy sources,
>or that they are renewable. Still, I enjoy the challenge and thinking
>outside of the box.


I don't think I ever stated oil was cleaner than any alternative energy
source.  I believe I stated I could find something "dirty" in an alternative
energy source.

Greg

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:DMCForum-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:DMCForum-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Home Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN


Copyright 2006 ProjectVixen.com.  All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
DMCForum Mailing List Archive  DMCNews Mailing List Archive  DMC-UK Mailing List Archive