RE: [DMCForum] Indecent stickers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [DMCForum] Indecent stickers



A similar thing happened with a kit car company making the Lamborghini
Countach.  I think the company name was Provo.

Their replica was so exact, as in down to the millimeter in some places; it
was as if they pulled molds off a real car.  Supposedly Lamborghini sued
them into nonexistence.

Ferrari did a similar thing with a kit car company but I think the end
result was they could not put the Ferrari logo on the car.  Owners would
later add the badges themselves.

Disclaimer:  This is all stuff I read long ago and is from memory.  The
actual details and events may or may not be true.  I could have even pulled
part of this out my ass.

Greg


-----Original Message-----
From: DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Ryan Wright
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 12:11 PM
To: DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [DMCForum] Indecent stickers

On 6/20/06, Bob Brandys <BobB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  I personally know Andy Perillo and what he went through with WB with
>  the Batman car.  Also, cars CAN BE confiscated. (It is done routinely
>  in drug busts.  It is done routinely with parking ticket violators.  It
>  is done routinely with people who drive cars that failed emission
>  tests.)

Bob, Bob, Bob... Criminal confiscation of cars is done by the
government, not a private party. Surely you can see the difference
between the two entities.

I challenge you to find me any legal precedent for a private party
confiscating the vehicle of another private party where the owner
holds clear title. I don't mean heresay, I mean a legal precedent - a
transcript of an actual court decision. You won't find one because it
hasn't happened. And yes, a corporation is a private party.

> It was done with other Batmobiles.  The legal theory is
>  simple.  It is the same as confiscation of "fake" fancy brand
>  merchandise.  Yes, the illegal copies were owned by the "Faker" but the
>  name brands just took ownership.

A completely different situation.

> the under neath chassis has nothing to do with it.

No, you're wrong. If I built a replica Ferrari out of a Fiero, Ferrari
has no right to that Fiero chassis, which, incidentally, is what will
be written on the title: 1988 Pontiac Fiero. They can't come in and
say, "You have to give me your Fiero because it looks like one of our
cars."

>  NEVER underestimate what corporations will do.

I don't. But corporations are not the government and they don't have
the same rights.

-Ryan



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/HliolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Home Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN


Copyright 2006 ProjectVixen.com.  All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
DMCForum Mailing List Archive  DMCNews Mailing List Archive  DMC-UK Mailing List Archive