[DML] Re: Galvanic corrosion
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DML] Re: Galvanic corrosion
- From: "Toby Peterson" <tobyp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:25:49 -0000
Charles - This is a good site for basic information like this. I
haven't seen this kind of data presented this way. The military
specification manuals express it differently, but this site will work
fine. They propose an "anodic" index, which is just a measure of the
galvanic potential for each material. If the materials are close
together in terms of this value, then no corrosion will occur (all
things being equal). The farther apart they are in the anodic index,
the worse the corrosive potential will be. The stainless steels that
we have in the car are listed as the "18% chromium type", with a value
of .50. The engine block and other aluminum bits are probably in the
category "Aluminum, cast alloys other than silicon", with a value
of .95. The distance between these values is .45. The "normal"
carbon-based steels used for most bolts are at .85, while the cadmium
plating used on many bolts is also .95. So, the difference in anodic
values with the aluminum is only 10 at the most. The paragraph above
the table on the site says that in a harsh environment, the difference
should not be more than .15 to avoid galvanic corrosion. Therefore,
all things being equal, there is a concern with using stainless steel.
However, the additive packages in most good aluminum-compatible
antifreeze products are designed to prevent this kind of corrosion, or
at least slow it way down. When the antifreeze is old, the additives
dissipate, leaving the system open to this type of damage. As has
been said on this List many times, change your antifreeze every two
years and you should be fine.
Toby Peterson VIN 2248 "Winged1"
DeLorean Parts Northwest, LLC
www.delorean-parts.com
--- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Charlesdos Mavor" <charlesmajor@xxxx>
wrote:
> Here is one more site, it gives the numbers and limits. I know that
> there are some really smart people on the list that can break it all
> down for us. So, my question is should we be using plastics? Small
> changes like the SS water return pipe and the SS coolant bottle may
be
> problems in 15 or 20 years for the block. I am asking not slaming
> products (I have the SS pipe and want the bottle).
>
> http://www.engineersedge.com/galvanic_capatability.htm
>
> Charles
To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:
moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx
For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com
To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN